Facing an unpaid invoice, the question isn’t choosing between the two — it’s knowing in what order and when to move from one to the other. Here’s how to structure that decision.
Talk to an expert
Amicable collection covers every step taken without involving a court: phone and written follow-ups, then, if there’s no response, a formal notice (mise en demeure) — a registered letter demanding payment within a specific deadline, and the essential written record before any legal follow-up.
Its main advantage is speed and preserving the business relationship: most debts get settled at this stage, provided follow-ups are structured (frequency, tone, gradual escalation) rather than improvised case by case.
When amicable collection fails or the debtor stays silent despite the formal notice, legal action takes over. For an undisputed B2B debt, the injonction de payer (payment order) is the fastest and cheapest procedure: a request filed with the competent court, which can issue an order without a hearing if the file (invoices, purchase orders, formal notice) is complete.
If the debtor disputes the debt or the case is more complex, a full lawsuit (assignation au fond) becomes necessary — a longer procedure, with a contested hearing before the court.
Three signals indicate it’s time to move past the amicable phase:
Conversely, extending the amicable phase indefinitely without a formal notice or clear deadline only delays the decision and brings the debt closer to being time-barred (5 years for a commercial debt).
A dedicated account manager structures this escalation for you: calibrated follow-ups, a formal notice at the right time, then building the legal file (payment order or lawsuit) if amicable collection doesn’t succeed — without ever shifting tone abruptly. Firmness applies to the legal framework, never to the tone.
Discover our amicable and legal collection support →In nearly every case, yes. Amicable collection (follow-ups, formal notice) is faster, cheaper, and preserves the business relationship. Legal action only makes sense once amicable collection has been genuinely attempted and failed, or when the debtor is clearly acting in bad faith.
It's a formal letter, usually sent by registered mail with acknowledgment of receipt, demanding payment within a specific deadline. It legally marks the shift to a firmer stage and is an almost systematic prerequisite before any legal proceeding — it serves as proof that the debtor was formally informed.
There's no fixed legal duration: a well-run amicable phase typically lasts a few weeks to two or three months, depending on the debtor's responsiveness. Beyond that, if follow-ups and the formal notice have no effect, extending the amicable phase becomes counterproductive.
For an undisputed B2B debt, the injonction de payer (payment order) is the fastest and cheapest route: a request filed with the competent court, which can issue an order without a hearing if the file (invoices, purchase orders, formal notice) is complete. If the debtor disputes the debt or the case is more complex, a full lawsuit (assignation au fond) becomes necessary.
Not necessarily. A legal proceeding concerns a specific debt, not the whole relationship. Many companies keep working with a client after a payment order, once the debt is settled — provided the process is handled rigorously, without an excessive tone.
Yes, structurally: court fees, bailiff or lawyer fees depending on the procedure, and longer timeframes. That's why amicable collection remains the preferred route as long as it has a reasonable chance of success — legal action is a recourse, not a first option.
Amicable follow-up, formal notice, legal action: a first conversation is enough to assess your case and choose the fastest route, without unnecessary escalation.
We evaluate with you where your debt actually stands and whether legal action is justified.
Follow-ups, formal notice, procedure: each step is taken at the right time, never by default.
Firm on substance, measured in tone — even once a case moves to legal action.